CMO shakeups surged in 2025. Here’s how AI keeps marketing, procurement, and demand planning stable through leadership transitions—especially in media and entertainment.

CMO Transitions: AI Playbook for Smarter Handoffs
A CMO change used to be mostly a messaging problem. New leader, new campaign, new agency roster, maybe a brand refresh.
In 2025, it’s also an operations problem.
Rebecca Stewart’s roundup of the year’s biggest CMO shakeups—spanning brands like Airbnb, Hinge, Nike, McDonald’s, Mattel, and Tylenol—reads like a reminder that marketing leadership is more fluid than ever. The reason this matters for the AI in Supply Chain & Procurement series: modern marketing performance is tied to supply planning, inventory availability, media mix efficiency, and even vendor risk. When the top marketer changes, the ripple hits forecasting, procurement cycles, and how fast teams can execute.
The opportunity is straightforward: AI can make CMO transitions less disruptive and more measurable—especially in media and entertainment, where audience attention shifts weekly and content pipelines are expensive to mismanage.
Why 2025’s CMO shakeups hit harder than previous years
Answer first: CMO turnover is more damaging now because marketing is tightly coupled to data, technology, and the supply chain of content and product availability.
A decade ago, a CMO could focus on brand positioning while other leaders handled analytics depth, martech architecture, and operational planning. That model doesn’t hold in 2025. Today’s CMO is expected to be fluent in:
- Performance and brand measurement across channels
- First-party data strategy in a post-cookie environment
- AI-assisted creative and personalization
- Cross-functional planning with finance, product, and operations
In consumer brands (think QSR, apparel, toys, health), the marketing calendar is basically a demand signal. When leadership changes, the first thing that often changes is the “bet”: where to spend, what to promote, what to cut. If those bets aren’t connected to supply realities—inventory, lead times, supplier constraints—you get the classic failure mode: marketing creates demand the business can’t fulfill.
Media and entertainment companies have their own version of this: marketing can spike interest in a show, tour, or release that the content pipeline, licensing, or distribution ops can’t support. That’s a brand hit and a revenue hit.
The hidden cost: “strategy reset” delays
Most companies underestimate the cost of the first 60–90 days after a CMO transition. It’s not just onboarding. It’s the time spent re-litigating:
- What success metrics matter (brand lift vs. CAC vs. retention)
- Which audiences are “priority” this quarter
- Which vendors and platforms are trusted
- Which campaigns get paused while the new leader reassesses
Those pauses are expensive in peak seasons. And December 2025 is the reminder: holiday performance is won or lost in planning that started months ago. A leadership change mid-year can still show up as a holiday miss.
The modern CMO job: brand leader + data operator + procurement partner
Answer first: The best CMOs now treat marketing like a supply chain—inputs (audience insights, creative, media, partners) flow into outputs (demand, revenue, retention), and AI helps keep it stable during leadership changes.
The RSS summary highlights big-brand shuffles. Even without the full list, the pattern is recognizable: household names rotate marketing leaders when growth stalls, brand relevance slips, or channel economics change.
Here’s what’s different in 2025: CMOs don’t just “own the story.” They own an ecosystem of spend and partners.
Marketing procurement is now a core CMO competency
Marketing is one of the largest discretionary budgets in many orgs, and it’s fragmented across:
- Media buying and measurement partners
- Creative production and post-production
- Influencer networks and talent contracts
- Data providers and clean rooms
- Martech and customer data platforms
That’s procurement complexity. And during a CMO change, vendor churn is common: new agencies, new tools, new attribution model. Sometimes it’s needed. Often it’s just expensive thrash.
A practical stance: if you change leaders and vendors at the same time, you rarely know what caused performance to move. AI can help isolate variables—but only if you set it up before the transition.
Media and entertainment: content is your supply chain
In media and entertainment, the “product” is a pipeline: development, production, distribution, marketing, and monetization. A new marketing leader may want to re-position a franchise, change release cadence, or chase a new audience segment.
AI-driven audience insights can prevent the most common mistake: treating brand repositioning as a creative decision instead of a demand forecast.
How AI reduces transition risk (and makes the first 90 days count)
Answer first: Use AI to preserve institutional knowledge, stabilize measurement, and connect marketing decisions to demand planning and procurement constraints.
When a CMO exits, the company loses more than a person. It loses a map: why certain choices were made, what trade-offs existed, which experiments were in flight, and what “good” looks like.
AI can act as a continuity layer—if you treat it like one.
1) Build an “always-on” marketing knowledge base
The fastest way to shorten a new CMO’s ramp is a searchable system that answers questions with evidence.
What it includes:
- Prior briefs, messaging frameworks, and creative rationales
- Media mix history and incrementality results
- Audience segmentation definitions and changes over time
- Campaign post-mortems (what worked, what failed, why)
- Vendor scorecards and contract renewal timelines
With modern retrieval-based assistants, leadership can ask:
“Show me the last four quarters of paid social efficiency by segment, and the creative themes that correlated with retention.”
That’s not a nice-to-have. It prevents the “start from scratch” instinct that causes wasted spend.
2) Stabilize measurement with a transition-proof scorecard
New CMOs often change KPIs early. Sometimes that’s correct. But switching metrics without a bridge makes performance trends unreadable.
A transition-proof scorecard has:
- North Star metric (e.g., contribution margin, subscriber LTV, repeat purchase rate)
- Channel diagnostics (leading indicators like CTR, view-through rate, site conversion)
- Brand health signals (share of search, consideration, NPS or equivalent)
- Operational constraints (inventory cover, fulfillment capacity, content release capacity)
AI helps by detecting when performance shifts are seasonal vs. structural, and by flagging anomalies that deserve human investigation.
3) Connect marketing demand signals to supply planning
This is where the AI in Supply Chain & Procurement theme becomes real.
For consumer brands, marketing creates demand variability. AI forecasting models can incorporate:
- Planned campaign spend and flighting
- Promo depth and pricing changes
- Historical lift by region/channel
- External signals (search trends, weather, competitor activity)
For media and entertainment, forecasting can incorporate:
- Trailer drops, influencer activations, and PR moments
- Release windows and competitor releases
- Audience cohort behavior (binge vs. weekly cadence)
The goal is simple: marketing shouldn’t surprise operations. A new CMO should inherit a system where the operational impact of a campaign is visible before spend is committed.
4) Use AI to audit vendor performance before changing partners
A common post-transition move is “new leader, new agency.” Sometimes that’s necessary. But it’s often driven by vibes, not evidence.
AI can speed up vendor evaluation by summarizing:
- Cost per deliverable trends (creative production, edits, versions)
- Turnaround time and revision cycles
- Performance by creative concept and format
- Contract terms that constrain flexibility
Then procurement can run a cleaner process:
- Keep what’s working
- Renegotiate what’s overpriced
- Replace only what’s truly underperforming
That reduces disruption, especially in peak planning windows.
A practical 30-60-90 day plan for incoming CMOs (with AI built in)
Answer first: The best first 90 days balance continuity and change—AI helps you decide what to keep, what to fix, and what to stop.
Here’s a plan I’ve seen work because it respects reality: you can’t rebuild everything while running live campaigns.
Days 1–30: Protect the pipeline
Focus: stop avoidable breakage.
- Freeze major measurement changes (keep trend continuity)
- Review top 10 revenue-driving programs and their dependencies
- Identify “single points of failure” (one analyst, one agency, one dashboard)
- Stand up an AI assistant over marketing docs, reports, and briefs
Deliverable: Transition Brief v1 (what’s running, why, and what could blow up)
Days 31–60: Decide what’s actually true
Focus: validate assumptions with data.
- Run an AI-supported audit of media mix and incrementality
- Re-check segmentation using current first-party signals
- Stress-test demand forecasts with planned spend scenarios
- Pull procurement into the room for vendor performance and contract timing
Deliverable: Evidence-based stop/start/scale list (10 items max)
Days 61–90: Make the first signature move
Focus: one clear bet, not ten.
- Choose one high-impact shift (creative system, channel mix, lifecycle marketing, content strategy)
- Define success metrics that connect to margin and capacity
- Operationalize: who owns the dashboard, the model, and the weekly decisions
Deliverable: One flagship initiative with measurable outcomes and cross-functional buy-in
People also ask: what does AI literacy mean for a CMO now?
Answer first: AI literacy for CMOs is the ability to ask better questions, set guardrails, and make decisions from models without outsourcing judgment.
Practical markers of AI-literate marketing leadership:
- Can explain the difference between correlation and incrementality
- Understands where data leakage can ruin a model
- Sets policies for brand safety and synthetic content use
- Knows how to evaluate vendors promising “AI optimization”
- Can partner with supply chain and procurement on forecasting and risk
This is especially relevant in media and entertainment, where generative tools accelerate creative volume but also raise rights, licensing, and reputational risks.
What these CMO shakeups signal for 2026 planning
The pattern behind the 2025 CMO changes isn’t just “companies replacing leaders.” It’s companies admitting that marketing has become a systems problem—data systems, vendor systems, decision systems.
If you’re heading into 2026 planning, I’d treat leadership volatility as a given and build for it:
- Make your measurement stack resilient to org churn
- Treat marketing procurement like a performance function, not paperwork
- Tie campaign planning to demand forecasting and capacity constraints
- Use AI to preserve institutional knowledge so transitions don’t reset the clock
Marketing will always be part art. But the operational side is where most companies get hurt during a CMO change.
If you knew your CMO role could turn over tomorrow, what would you automate or document this week so your marketing “supply chain” keeps running—and keeps learning?