AI Platform Partnerships: Lessons from Drug Discovery

AI Business Tools Singapore••By 3L3C

Schrodinger and Eli Lilly’s TuneLab deal shows why AI wins through integrations. Learn a practical framework Singapore firms can copy for AI adoption.

AI adoptionAI integrationsenterprise softwarehealthcare AISingapore businessworkflow automation
Share:

AI Platform Partnerships: Lessons from Drug Discovery

Drug discovery has a reputation for being slow and brutally expensive. That’s why a small line in a Reuters brief (picked up by CNA on 9 Jan 2026) matters more than it looks: Schrodinger is integrating Eli Lilly’s AI platform, TuneLab, into Schrodinger’s LiveDesign software—with existing LiveDesign clients getting access in Q1 2026 and new users in Q2 2026.

If you’re reading this as part of our AI Business Tools Singapore series, here’s the point: this isn’t “healthcare news” that stays in healthcare. It’s a clean case study of what works when AI becomes a product capability delivered through partnerships, not a side project sitting in a lab. Singapore businesses—whether you’re in professional services, logistics, retail, or B2B SaaS—can copy the playbook.

The practical lesson is simple: AI adoption accelerates when it shows up inside the tools teams already use, backed by credible data, and packaged with governance that makes risk feel manageable.

What happened: TuneLab inside LiveDesign (and why it’s a big deal)

Schrodinger builds software used by chemists to design molecules and predict properties (think absorption, distribution, and other signals of how a compound may behave). Eli Lilly launched TuneLab last year as an AI/ML platform trained on years of Lilly research data. The new collaboration brings TuneLab directly into LiveDesign, Schrodinger’s cloud platform.

Here’s the key shift: biotechs won’t need a separate AI workflow to benefit from Lilly’s models. They can access the AI capability from within a familiar environment used for day-to-day decisions.

Two quotes from the source capture the strategy:

“More biotechs using the models means more diverse training data... Ultimately, this is about moving molecules through discovery faster for the patients who are waiting.”

That’s not marketing fluff—it’s a data flywheel statement. More usage leads to more data diversity, which can improve models, which can improve outcomes, which increases usage again.

The larger context: AI adoption is being pulled, not pushed

The Reuters/CNA piece also notes two forces:

  • Drug developers are increasing AI use for discovery and safety testing to get faster and cheaper results.
  • There’s an FDA push to reduce animal testing in the near future, which raises demand for alternative methods (including computational and in‑silico approaches).

Even if your company has nothing to do with pharmaceuticals, you should pay attention to this pattern: regulatory and cost pressure creates a “pull” for AI. The winners package AI into workflows, not slide decks.

The real lesson for Singapore businesses: integration beats experimentation

Most companies get this wrong. They start with an AI experiment—one clever proof of concept—then struggle to get adoption because it lives outside normal work.

The Schrodinger–Lilly integration shows the opposite approach:

  • Put AI where the work happens (inside LiveDesign).
  • Reduce switching costs (no extra dashboards, logins, or data exports).
  • Make it usable by non-ML specialists (chemists stay chemists; AI supports decisions).

For Singapore teams trying to roll out AI business tools, this is the clearest adoption rule I’ve seen work in practice:

If AI requires your team to change tools, it will stall. If it improves the tool they already rely on, it spreads.

Bridge point #1: AI adoption in business processes

LiveDesign helps chemists predict properties and iterate on compounds faster. Translate that into business:

  • Sales teams want better lead scoring and forecasting.
  • Operations teams want better demand planning and exception handling.
  • Customer support teams want faster triage and higher first-contact resolution.

In every case, adoption increases when AI is embedded into the system of record (CRM, ERP, helpdesk) rather than bolted on.

Bridge point #2: partnerships and integrations are the scaling strategy

Lilly didn’t just keep TuneLab internal; it’s offering access to biotech partners and now via Schrodinger’s platform. That signals a mature view: distribution matters as much as model quality.

Singapore SMEs and mid-market firms can mirror this without building foundation models:

  • Pair your internal data with a trusted AI vendor’s models.
  • Integrate via APIs into your existing workflow tools.
  • Negotiate usage, privacy, and retention terms that match your risk profile.

If you’re deciding between “build vs buy,” a more useful frame is often “compose”: buy a capability, connect it to your data, and make it feel native.

A practical framework: how to evaluate AI tool integrations (without getting lost)

When leaders ask “Should we adopt this AI tool?”, the wrong answer is a feature list. The right answer is an integration checklist.

1) Workflow fit: does AI show up at decision time?

AI is only valuable if it appears at the moment a person makes a decision.

  • In drug design, that’s when selecting the next compound to synthesize.
  • In business, that might be when approving a discount, scheduling staff, or responding to a customer escalation.

A quick test: Can your team use the AI output in under 30 seconds without leaving their main screen? If not, adoption will be patchy.

2) Data advantage: what makes the model credible?

TuneLab’s edge is that it’s trained on years of Lilly research data. In business tools, the same principle applies:

  • Vendor models are generic until you connect your data.
  • Your data is often messy until you define consistent events and fields.

If you want AI to work in customer engagement, you need clean signals: lifecycle stage, last purchase date, complaint categories, contract tier, and so on.

3) Feedback loop: does the system get better with use?

Lilly explicitly calls out “more diverse training data” as more biotechs use the models.

In Singapore business operations, ask:

  • Do users correct AI outputs (and are corrections captured)?
  • Are outcomes tracked (did the lead convert, did churn reduce, did returns drop)?
  • Can you run controlled tests (A/B or holdout groups)?

If there’s no feedback loop, you’re buying a static feature—not an improving capability.

4) Governance: can you control risk without killing speed?

Regulated industries learned this the hard way: AI without governance is a liability.

You don’t need pharma-level controls, but you do need basics:

  • Role-based access to sensitive fields
  • Logging of prompts/outputs for audit
  • Clear data retention rules
  • Human approval for high-impact decisions (pricing, credit, hiring)

The strongest Singapore teams I’ve worked with treat governance as an enabler: it makes adoption easier because stakeholders (IT, legal, compliance) stop blocking rollout.

What “moving molecules faster” teaches about moving work faster

Lilly’s line about “moving molecules through discovery faster” maps neatly to what every business actually wants: moving work through a system faster, with fewer expensive mistakes.

Here are three concrete parallels you can apply immediately.

1) Replace handoffs with “decision support”

In many companies, delays come from handoffs—someone exports data, sends it to another team, waits for analysis, then comes back.

A better approach is decision support inside the workflow:

  • Finance: AI flags anomalies as invoices are processed.
  • HR: AI drafts compliant job descriptions and highlights bias risks before posting.
  • Procurement: AI suggests alternative suppliers when lead times spike.

2) Treat AI as an add-on to expertise, not a replacement

Schrodinger’s value proposition isn’t “AI replaces chemists.” It’s “chemists design better compounds with stronger predictions.” That’s a healthier mental model for business too.

If your rollout message sounds like replacement, people will resist or quietly sabotage adoption. If it sounds like fewer tedious steps and better decisions, you’ll get champions.

3) Build a “model portfolio,” not a one-model obsession

TuneLab is a platform with multiple models trained on research history. Businesses should do the same:

  • One model for inbound lead prioritisation
  • One model for churn risk
  • One model for ticket routing
  • One model for inventory exceptions

This is why AI business tools often beat DIY builds: vendors already package multiple capabilities with monitoring and integrations.

Common questions Singapore leaders ask (and straight answers)

“Do we need to build our own AI to compete?”

No. Most companies should focus on data readiness + integration. The competitive edge usually comes from your process knowledge and customer data, not training a model from scratch.

“What’s the first AI tool we should implement?”

Start where you can measure impact in 30–60 days:

  • Customer support triage and macros
  • Sales call summaries and CRM updates
  • Marketing content QA and localisation workflows
  • Finance reconciliation and anomaly detection

Pick a workflow with high volume, clear outcomes, and low downside risk.

“How do we avoid buying an AI tool nobody uses?”

Copy the Schrodinger–Lilly play: embed AI into the existing platform and design the rollout around day-to-day tasks. Adoption follows convenience.

What to do next if you’re planning AI adoption in 2026

January is when teams set budgets and roadmaps. If AI is on yours, take a page from this drug discovery partnership:

  1. List 3 workflows where decisions are frequent and delays are costly.
  2. Choose tools that integrate into your current stack (CRM/ERP/helpdesk), not tools that demand a new stack.
  3. Define one measurable outcome per workflow (time-to-response, conversion rate, cost per ticket, stockout rate).
  4. Set governance upfront so rollouts don’t stall at sign-off.

If you want help selecting and implementing AI business tools in Singapore—especially tools that fit your current systems and can show results within a quarter—this is exactly what our series is about.

This partnership is a reminder that AI progress rarely comes from a single brilliant model. It comes from integration, distribution, and feedback loops. Which workflow in your business is ready for that treatment first?

Source: Reuters via CNA, “Schrodinger to offer Eli Lilly's AI drug discovery platform on its software” (9 Jan 2026). Landing page: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/business/schrodinger-offer-eli-lillys-ai-drug-discovery-platform-its-software-5848826