UK Battery Storage Rebounds – What November’s Data Really Tells Us

Why November’s UK BESS rebound matters

Pre‑application and full planning submissions for UK grid‑scale battery energy storage systems (BESS) both jumped back over 1GWh in November 2025. That’s the highest level since June, just as the National Energy System Operator (NESO) is reshaping the grid connection queue and cutting 153GW of stalled projects.

Most companies look at a stat like “1,740MWh of planning applications” and shrug. But this is the kind of signal that tells you whether the UK energy transition is stalling or quietly regrouping. For anyone working in green technology, clean energy investment, or grid‑scale development, November’s rebound is a strong hint: the market is adapting rather than retreating.

This matters because battery storage is now the enabling layer for everything else we talk about in this Green Technology series – from AI‑optimised renewables to smart cities and flexible, low‑carbon grids. If storage projects aren’t moving through planning, the rest is just PowerPoint.

In this post, I’ll break down what November’s numbers actually mean, how they fit into the NESO reforms, and where the smartest developers and investors are focusing next.

---

The November numbers: a quiet vote of confidence

The core story is simple: UK BESS development activity picked back up in November.

• Pre‑application submissions: 615MW / 1,230MWh
• Full planning applications: 870MW / 1,740MWh
• Both metrics back above 1GWh for the first time since June 2025

Here’s what that tells us.

1. Developers haven’t lost their nerve

After months of uncertainty around grid connections and changing revenue stacks (especially balancing services and wholesale arbitrage), lots of people assumed UK storage developers would sit on their hands. That clearly isn’t happening.

When you see 870MW of projects going all the way to full planning in a single month, that’s a hard commitment of time, consultancy money and political capital. Nobody does that if they think the market is dead.

2. Projects are being reshaped, not abandoned

NESO’s connection queue reforms have already removed 153GW of battery projects that were unlikely to connect. Painful for some developers, yes, but the reality is those megawatts were never all going to hit the grid.

The return of >1GWh of monthly planning submissions right before and after those reforms is a strong signal that:

• The serious players are re‑profiling projects around realistic connection dates
• Sites with strong grid fundamentals (capacity, reinforcement plans, proximity to demand) are getting prioritised
• Capital is being redirected from speculative pipelines into bankable assets

That’s exactly what a maturing green technology market looks like.

---

Pre‑application vs full planning: why both matter

A lot of people outside the UK planning world lump everything into “applications”. That’s how blind spots creep in.

In reality, pre‑application and full planning tell you different things about market sentiment and risk appetite.

What pre‑application submissions signal

Pre‑application is a voluntary step where developers sound out local authorities and key stakeholders before submitting the full planning pack. November saw:

• 615MW / 1,230MWh of new projects at pre‑app stage

This phase is where the smartest developers:

• Test site suitability (land use, visual impact, ecology)
• Identify local political pressure points early
• Refine layout and sizing before locking in design and grid costs

When pre‑apps rise, it’s usually the first hint that the next six to twelve months of full applications will grow. So November’s 1,230MWh isn’t just a number – it’s a pipeline indicator for late 2026–2027 energisation, especially for 2–4 hour grid‑scale assets.

Why full planning applications are the real commitment test

Full planning applications are a different beast entirely. You don’t file one casually.

To reach 870MW / 1,740MWh of full planning in a month, developers have already:

• Locked in a grid offer (or a realistic pathway to one)
• Commissioned detailed environmental, traffic, heritage and noise studies
• Hired planners, lawyers, consultants – and paid for all of it

For investors, this is the stage worth tracking closely. It tells you where capital will likely be deployed in the next 18–24 months and which local planning authorities are becoming ‘storage‑friendly’.

If I’m a fund or IPP, I’m asking:

• Which councils are consistently approving BESS within 6–12 months?
• Where do we see repeat developers – a sign of smoother planning relationships?
• How do these locations align with NESO’s new connection timelines and reinforcement zones?

The developers that join these dots get to commercial operation earlier, with better revenue stacking options and fewer political surprises.

---

NESO reforms: short‑term pain, long‑term clarity

The other big backdrop to November’s rebound is NESO’s ongoing overhaul of the grid connection queue.

Under the new process, NESO will:

• Offer grid connections up to 2035 for around 283GW of projects
• Remove projects that aren’t progressing or can’t meet milestones
• Clear out speculative “paper projects” that were clogging up the queue

On paper, cutting 153GW of battery storage projects sounds brutal. In practice, it’s exactly what the sector needed.

Why this is good news for serious BESS players

If you’re running a genuine, well‑designed BESS project, the old system punished you:

• You sat behind thousands of barely‑advanced projects
• Connection dates drifted endlessly into the 2030s
• Investors struggled to price risk or commit capital

The reformed process does three crucial things:

1. Improves visibility: Realistic connection dates out to 2035 make it easier to structure long‑term revenue models and financing.
2. Rewards delivery discipline: Projects that hit milestones keep their place; those that don’t are recycled out.
3. Reduces speculative noise: Fewer “fake” megawatts in the queue means better system planning and more credible capacity projections.

The fact that planning submissions bounced back above 1GWh while these reforms were underway tells you how the market really feels: the serious developers would rather have a tighter, credible queue than fantasy connection dates.

---

Where green technology and AI fit into UK BESS growth

Here’s the thing about UK BESS right now: hardware isn’t the bottleneck. Technology costs have fallen, supply chains are more mature, and multi‑hundred‑MWh projects like the Carrington site in Greater Manchester are standard practice.

The real differentiators are software, data and integration with other green technologies.

AI‑driven optimisation of grid‑scale batteries

Modern battery storage assets live or die on how well they’re optimised. AI is already reshaping that in a few ways:

• Revenue stacking: Algorithms continuously rebalance between wholesale arbitrage, balancing services and capacity revenues, based on minute‑by‑minute prices.
• Degradation management: Predictive models choose operating strategies that extend asset life while still meeting revenue targets.
• Location intelligence: Machine learning models help developers rank sites by long‑term value, not just initial grid availability.

If you’re evaluating November’s rebound from a green technology lens, this is the key insight: the wave of new projects isn’t just more boxes on the grid. It’s more flexible, AI‑optimised capacity that can support high penetrations of wind and solar without constant curtailment.

Storage as the backbone of smart, low‑carbon regions

Projects like the Carrington facility at Trafford Low Carbon Energy Park show where this is heading:

• Co‑located with other low‑carbon infrastructure
• Strategically sited near urban demand in Greater Manchester
• Playing into a regional energy strategy rather than operating as a one‑off asset

That’s the model smart cities and regions are moving towards: AI‑orchestrated local energy ecosystems where battery storage keeps the system reliable while renewables dominate the energy mix.

The November planning data suggests more of these ecosystems are now being planned – even as the grid connection landscape gets tougher.

---

Practical implications for developers, investors and policymakers

If you’re working in or around UK BESS, November’s rebound isn’t just a reassuring headline. It should nudge some concrete decisions.

For developers

You need to assume that planning and grid discipline are now your core competitive advantages.

Focus on:

• Early, honest pre‑app engagement with councils – especially around landscape, safety and traffic
• Data‑driven site selection that aligns planning risk, grid strength and NESO’s reinforcement plans
• AI‑based revenue and degradation modelling from day one, not bolted on after FID

Most companies get this wrong by treating planning as a linear tick‑box exercise. The better approach is iterative: planning, grid, commercial model and technical design all inform each other from the first spreadsheet.

For investors

The signal from November: the market is consolidating, not collapsing.

Questions I’d be asking teams pitching BESS assets right now:

• How did your projects fare in the NESO queue clean‑up – and why?
• What’s your plan if connection dates move by 2–3 years?
• Which local planning authorities do you know well, and what’s their track record on BESS approvals?
• How are you using optimisation software or AI to defend returns under different price scenarios?

The funds that will win in 2026–2030 are the ones backing fewer, better‑structured projects with robust planning, credible grid paths and serious digital capability.

For councils and policymakers

November’s 1GWh+ of submissions is a reminder: storage is coming anyway. The real choice for local and national government isn’t “storage or no storage” – it’s whether you:

• Shape it with clear, consistent planning guidance, or
• End up with ad‑hoc decisions, community pushback and slower decarbonisation

Standardised safety requirements, template conditions and transparent timelines would do more for net‑zero progress than yet another strategy document.

---

Where the UK BESS market goes next

The rebound in November planning and pre‑application submissions shows a UK battery storage sector that’s adapting to tougher rules rather than stepping back. NESO’s reforms have cut speculative noise, and serious developers are already moving to fill the space with better‑designed, better‑optimised projects.

For the wider green technology ecosystem, that’s good news. AI‑driven storage is what allows high renewable penetration, electrified transport and smart cities to scale without constant reliability scares.

If you’re a developer, investor or policymaker, the next step is straightforward: treat storage as critical infrastructure, not a speculative add‑on. Get planning, grid and optimisation aligned early, and you’ll be on the right side of the market reshuffle.

The UK is about to find out which battery projects were just queue placeholders – and which ones are ready to carry a decarbonised grid. November’s numbers suggest the second group is getting organised.