COP30, African climate shocks and new land data all point to one thing: climate risk is now a land, water and food risk. Here’s how green tech can actually help.
Most companies planning their 2026 climate strategy are missing the same thing: their risk models still assume stable land, water and food systems. The news from COP30 in Belém, and from across Africa, shows that assumption is already broken.
This matters because the physical risks are now colliding with supply chains in real time: cocoa harvests collapsing, fertiliser shortages, drought emergencies, disappearing grasslands, forests turning from carbon sinks into sources. At the same time, the climate talks that should be steering global action just wrapped up with food systems largely off the table.
Here’s the thing about green technology and AI: they’re often sold as abstract solutions while the real-world crises they’re meant to address look painfully concrete. So in this post, we’ll connect those dots. Using the latest stories from COP30, African climate extremes, and global land and water reports, we’ll look at how green technology can actually help – and where it can’t paper over bad policy.
1. COP30’s land and food gap – and where technology fits
COP30 in the Amazon city of Belém delivered strong language on forests and Indigenous land rights, but largely sidelined food systems from official texts. That’s a problem, because agriculture, land and food are where climate impacts hit business models first.
What COP30 managed to do
- Countries announced billions in new funds for forests through the Tropical Forest Forever Facility.
- Governments pledged to recognise Indigenous land tenure over about 160 million hectares of tropical forest.
- Roughly $1.8 billion was committed to help Indigenous, local and Afro-descendant communities secure land rights over the next five years.
Those are serious wins. Forest protection is one of the most powerful climate tools we’ve got, and securing Indigenous land rights is one of the most effective ways to keep those forests standing.
But experts still called the outcomes "bittersweet":
- Pledges to the new forest fund reportedly reached less than a quarter of the initial $25 billion target.
- Countries failed to agree on a clear plan to halt deforestation, despite repeating that promise at previous summits.
- Critical minerals and fossil fuel phaseout barely feature in the final texts.
- Food systems – which drive both deforestation and emissions – were almost "erased" from key negotiated outcomes.
From a green technology perspective, that gap is telling. We have powerful tools to monitor forests, track supply-chain deforestation and optimise land use – but they still sit on the edge of the main political deal.
Where AI and green tech should have been front and centre
If you work in food, forestry, retail or finance, the missed opportunity at COP30 is basically an invitation. Here’s what could (and should) be happening right now, regardless of the diplomatic language:
-
Real-time forest monitoring for compliance and finance
AI-powered satellite analysis can spot new forest loss down to a few hectares and flag it within days. Forest funds and banks funding agriculture should be:- Using automated deforestation alerts as a condition for releasing climate finance.
- Feeding those alerts directly into loan covenants and insurance pricing.
-
Supply-chain mapping that goes beyond spreadsheets
Most "deforestation-free" claims fail because companies only know their tier‑1 suppliers. AI can stitch together customs data, logistics records and geospatial information to:- Map indirect suppliers (the middlemen that usually hide the risk).
- Link individual farms to shipment volumes, not just to vague regions.
-
Scenario engines for land and climate risk
With climate models, yield projections and market data, machine learning can stress-test portfolios against:- Drought and flood scenarios.
- Forest loss tipping points.
- Policy shocks such as stricter deforestation rules or carbon border taxes.
Most companies still run these analyses as occasional consultancy projects. They need to become always-on systems, the same way you’d monitor cybersecurity or credit risk.
2. Africa’s climate shocks: what they signal to global supply chains
The past few months have been brutal across parts of Africa, and not just in humanitarian terms. They’re also a preview of how climate risk ripples through global commodities.
Somalia: when social protection fails, tech alone isn’t enough
Somalia has declared a drought emergency after four failed rainy seasons, with millions facing hunger and 130,000 people in immediate life-threatening need. Amnesty International says the country hasn’t built a functional social-security system to protect those most affected by drought.
This is a hard but necessary reminder: green technology doesn’t replace basic governance.
That said, there are clear roles for technology here:
- Early warning systems using AI to combine rainfall, soil moisture and conflict data can predict where displacement and hunger risk will surge.
- Targeting tools can help humanitarian agencies direct cash and food support to the right communities, reducing waste and political bias.
- Water and rangeland optimisation tools can suggest grazing rotations and small-scale water investments that protect both herders and ecosystems.
But none of this works if there’s no social safety net or if data is used to exclude, not protect. For tech-focused teams in larger companies or NGOs, the lesson is simple: pair data systems with governance reforms and community oversight from day one.
Cocoa in West Africa: climate risk is now a pricing problem
Ivory Coast’s main cocoa harvest is expected to drop sharply for the third year in a row. Drivers include erratic rainfall, crop disease, ageing farms and under‑investment. At the same time:
- The EU has delayed its deforestation-free supply chain law to 2026, pushing back incentives for sustainable production.
- About two million smallholder farmers could face delayed certification and payment cycles.
- In Ghana, high global cocoa prices aren’t reaching farmers, fuelling unprecedented cocoa smuggling.
For chocolate brands, retailers and investors, climate risk is no longer just a sustainability report issue. It’s a volume and margin issue.
Here’s where green technology and AI become business-critical, not optional:
- Farm‑level advisory apps: AI can turn climate and disease forecasts into simple advice on pruning, planting, shade trees and disease control, delivered via low‑bandwidth mobile.
- Smart pricing and traceability: Digital ledgers and remote sensing can link a specific cooperative’s climate risk and sustainability performance to price premiums in near real time.
- Portfolio rebalancing: Retailers can use AI to model how cocoa shortfalls affect product lines and to strategically invest in diversified ingredients or origin countries.
If your company sources any climate-sensitive commodity (cocoa, coffee, palm oil, rubber, soy), build this kind of climate‑aware procurement system now. Waiting for regulation to force your hand is just handing advantage to faster competitors.
Malawi’s fertiliser crisis: rethinking inputs with technology
Malawi’s president has admitted the country is heading into the rains "dangerously unprepared", with fertiliser supplies short and procurement behind schedule. For a largely agrarian economy, that’s a national emergency.
Globally, it’s also a warning: relying on imported synthetic fertiliser is becoming risky and expensive as energy prices, geopolitics and climate impacts collide.
Green technology has three clear roles here:
-
Precision fertiliser use
- Satellite data, farm sensors and AI can identify where fertiliser actually pays off in yield terms and where it’s largely wasted.
- This cuts cost for farmers and reduces nitrous oxide emissions and water pollution.
-
Biological alternatives and circular nutrients
- Data-driven R&D is speeding up the development of biofertilisers and soil microbes that reduce synthetic input needs.
- Waste-to-fertiliser systems – from urban organic waste or livestock manure – can be optimised with AI to produce consistent, localised nutrient streams.
-
Input risk dashboards
- Governments and large buyers can track fertiliser supply, shipping routes and price volatility with dedicated AI dashboards to avoid the "we didn’t see this coming" trap.
None of these fix a crisis overnight. But they show how green tech can systematically reduce dependence on fragile input chains.
3. Carbon markets, forests and the problem of "grey" credits
Another thread running through recent coverage is the fragility of many land-based carbon deals.
A series of high-profile carbon-credit agreements across Africa – covering millions of hectares and, in one case, about 20% of a country’s landmass – has reportedly stalled. Memorandums of understanding have lapsed without action, and some companies behind the deals are now unreachable.
At the same time, emerging research suggests that African forests as a whole are now emitting more CO₂ than they absorb, largely due to deforestation, degradation and fires.
For anyone relying on offsets or nature-based carbon projects, two points are non‑negotiable:
- You can’t treat land carbon as a stable, permanent asset without active management and monitoring.
- Opacity kills credibility. “Grey carbon” – deals nobody can fully explain or verify – is now a reputational and regulatory risk.
How green technology can clean up land-based carbon
This is one of the spaces where AI and remote sensing really do make a material difference:
- High-frequency monitoring: Weekly or even daily satellite imagery, analysed with machine learning, can detect degradation, not just total forest loss.
- Dynamic baselines: Instead of static historical averages, AI models can generate baselines that adapt to climate trends, fire risk and nearby land-use change.
- Risk‑adjusted credits: Platforms can automatically adjust the number of credits issued based on observed changes in forest health, drought stress or fire events.
- Open registries: Digital ledgers and public APIs can allow civil society and buyers to verify exactly what a credit represents: where, when and how it was generated.
If your business still treats carbon credits as generic, interchangeable units, update that thinking. The next wave of credible nature-based credits will be data‑rich, frequently updated and ruthlessly transparent – and they’ll be priced accordingly.
4. Land, water and food: building climate resilience with data
Beyond the headlines, a new UN Food and Agriculture Organization report paints the bigger picture: producing enough food by 2050 will pile extra pressure on land and water that are already overstretched.
Some key points:
- Agricultural land degradation is now widespread and is undermining global food systems.
- Urban areas more than doubled in size in just two decades, consuming around 24 million hectares of some of the most fertile cropland.
- The North Sea region, despite having only about 4% of Europe’s peatland area, produces more than 20% of peatland-related emissions for the EU, UK, Norway and Iceland.
Add to that: England and Wales have lost almost a third of their grasslands in 90 years, largely to mechanisation, agrochemicals and crop expansion. And the UK’s food system is still driving nature loss and climate change, with major retailers far off their own impact-reduction promises.
The pattern is clear: land and water systems are already at – or beyond – their safe operating space. The question is what businesses and governments do with that information.
Practical ways to use green tech to cut land and water risk
Whether you’re in retail, manufacturing, infrastructure or finance, there are concrete moves you can make now:
-
Map your land and water footprint with real data
- Combine procurement data with land-use maps to see where your products rely on degraded soils, shrinking water resources or high-deforestation frontiers.
- Include "invisible" impacts like embedded water in imported crops or feed.
-
Set location-specific targets, not global averages
- A litre of water saved in a water‑stressed basin is worth more than a litre saved in a wet one. AI can help prioritise hotspots.
- For land, focus on places where restoring peat, grasslands or riparian zones unlocks the biggest emission and biodiversity benefits.
-
Use digital twins and scenario planning
- Build digital twins of key assets or regions – farms, processing plants, distribution hubs – and test them against climate, policy and demand scenarios.
- Feed those results into capital planning, not just sustainability reports.
-
Reward suppliers for verified improvements
- Tie better contract terms to measurable improvements in soil health, water use and habitat protection, verified with remote sensing and ground data.
The reality? Most of the data and tools already exist. The bottleneck is organisational will and the tendency to treat sustainability as a side-project instead of an operational risk function.
5. What this means for your 2026 green technology roadmap
Stepping back from COP30, African weather extremes and the latest science, the pattern is brutally simple: climate risk is now a land, water and food risk. And that risk is materially relevant to almost every sector.
If you’re building a green technology or AI roadmap for 2026, three priorities are hard to argue with:
-
Put land, water and food at the centre of your climate strategy.
Don’t just track Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Track how your business depends on stable rainfall, healthy soils, intact forests and functioning rivers – then measure that exposure. -
Use AI to move from static reports to living systems.
Build always-on monitoring for deforestation, drought risk, fertiliser dependency and commodity volatility. If your risk dashboards refresh quarterly, you’re already behind. -
Tie data to decisions, not just disclosure.
The value isn’t in having another map; it’s in changing sourcing, capex, pricing and product design based on what those maps show.
COP30 may have left food systems and fossil fuel phaseout softer than many hoped. That doesn’t stop individual companies, cities or financial institutions from acting. Green technology and AI give you the tools; your governance, incentives and appetite for change determine whether they actually reduce risk.
The next few years will separate organisations that treat climate, land and food as strategic variables from those that treat them as PR topics. Which side you’re on will be obvious from your data infrastructure – and from how resilient your business looks the next time a harvest fails, a forest burns or a water source runs dry.