Why Eos’ $1B Bet on Zinc Batteries Matters Now

Most climate models agree on one thing: without long-duration energy storage, the clean energy transition stalls somewhere around 60–70% renewables. The gap isn’t generation anymore; it’s storage that can ride through nights, storms, and seasonal swings.

That’s why Eos Energy Enterprises raising over US$1 billion for its zinc-based battery manufacturing isn’t just another financing headline. It’s a signal that long-duration energy storage (LDES) is moving from PowerPoint to production lines—right as US policy, grid constraints, and AI-driven demand are colliding.

This matters because green technology isn’t just solar panels and EVs. It’s the infrastructure under the hood: batteries, software, manufacturing, and financing. And if you’re a developer, utility, investor, or climate-focused business looking for real decarbonisation tools—not just offsets—LDES is about to sit at the center of your strategy.

In this post, I’ll break down what Eos just did, why zinc batteries are getting serious attention alongside lithium-ion, and how US-based manufacturing plus smart financing is reshaping the energy storage landscape.

1. What Eos Actually Raised—And Why the Structure Matters

Eos didn’t just “raise a billion dollars.” It executed a set of transactions that change its risk profile, growth potential, and attractiveness to partners.

Here’s the core of the deal:

• US$600 million in 1.75% convertible senior notes due 2031
• Net proceeds of about US$580.5 million from that note issuance
• Proceeds used to repurchase US$200 million of higher-cost 6.75% notes due 2030
• Result: lower interest costs and extended maturities

On top of that:

• A registered direct offering of 35.9 million common shares at US$12.78 per share
• Combined (notes + equity), the transaction generated about US$458.2 million
• Roughly 7 million public warrants exercised, adding US$80.2 million in cash

Eos now reports:

• ~US$474 million cash added to the balance sheet from refinancing alone
• A Q3 2025 cash position of US$126.8 million (pre-transaction)
• A US$644.4 million order backlog (~2.5GWh)
• A commercial pipeline of US$22.6 billion (~91GWh)

So what does this mean in plain language?

• The company has time. Pushing major debt obligations out to 2031 while adding cash gives Eos a runway to reach manufacturing scale—something that kills many hardware climate startups.
• The capital structure is less fragile. Swapping 6.75% notes for 1.75% notes matters in a high-rate environment. Every saved dollar can go back into factories, R&D, and project execution.
• For buyers and partners, there’s lower counterparty risk. If you’re planning a 100MW project, you care that your storage provider is still around in 10 years.

From a green technology perspective, this is a classic move: use creative financing to turn a promising climate solution into bankable infrastructure.

2. Why Zinc-Based Long-Duration Storage Is a Big Deal

Here’s the thing about long-duration energy storage: most grids are still trying to use short-duration tools for long-duration problems.

Lithium-ion batteries excel at 1–4 hours of storage. They’re perfect for:

• Frequency regulation
• Peak shaving
• Short-term arbitrage
• Fast-response grid services

But once you start talking 4–16+ hours, the economics, safety profile, and materials picture change. Eos is betting on a different chemistry to tackle that window.

How Eos’ Zinc Technology Works (At a High Level)

Eos’ systems use a hybrid aqueous zinc cathode (often branded as Znyth). A few key points:

• Duration: Designed for 4–16+ hours of storage per cycle
• Materials: Uses zinc and other non-precious, readily available materials rather than cobalt, nickel, or lithium
• Safety: Aqueous (water-based) chemistries are inherently non-flammable, giving them an edge in:
  • Densely populated areas
  • Critical infrastructure
  • Sites with strict fire codes

Practically, this means Eos is targeting applications like:

• Firming large solar and wind portfolios
• Providing overnight renewable power blocks
• Replacing or deferring gas peaker plants
• Supporting microgrids and remote communities

I’ve found that when developers start seriously modeling 8–12 hour needs, they quickly realise lithium-ion isn’t always the cheapest or simplest answer—especially when you consider lifecycle, augmentation, and fire suppression costs.

But Isn’t Lithium-Ion Getting Cheaper and Denser?

Yes—and that’s exactly where the debate is.

Many developers and analysts argue that as lithium-ion costs fall and energy density improves, you can stack more hours (6–12) using the same chemistry and still hit attractive project economics.

So the real question isn’t “lithium vs zinc” in a vacuum. It’s:

For each use case, at each site, over 20+ years, which storage technology delivers the lowest cost and lowest risk for the required duration?

Zinc, flow batteries, and other LDES options don’t need to replace lithium-ion everywhere. They just need to dominate a few growing segments:

• 8–16 hour grid-scale storage
• Harsh environments where thermal management is tough
• Sites where safety and non-flammability are non-negotiable

Eos’ US$1+ billion financing is essentially a bet that those segments are large, real, and imminent.

3. Why US Manufacturing Is Now a Strategic Advantage

Eos isn’t just scaling technology. It’s scaling US-based manufacturing, and that’s a big deal for anyone planning projects in North America.

In October, the company announced a US$352.9 million investment to relocate its headquarters and expand in Pennsylvania, moving from New Jersey. Combined with its existing facilities, this signals a clear strategy: build where the demand and policy support are strongest.

Here’s why US manufacturing for green technology, especially batteries, is so valuable right now:

Policy Tailwinds and Local Content

Between tax credits, domestic content bonuses, and state-level incentives, US-based manufacturing is increasingly tied to project economics. For developers and IPPs:

• Using domestically manufactured storage hardware can improve project IRR via bonus credits.
• Sourcing from US factories reduces tariff exposure and geopolitical supply risk.

From a sustainability point of view, shorter supply chains also cut embedded emissions. If your brand sells “clean power,” it’s hard to justify a supply chain that zigzags across continents for every component.

Supply Security and Lead Times

Lithium-ion supply chains are still heavily concentrated in Asia. That concentration brings:

• Volatile lead times
• Currency and logistics risk
• Vulnerability to export restrictions or regional disruptions

US zinc-based manufacturing offers a counterweight:

• Alternative chemistry, reducing reliance on lithium and cobalt
• Regional production, aligning with US and Canadian grid build-out
• Potentially more predictable delivery schedules for large portfolios

For data center operators, utilities, and corporates planning multi-GWh deployments tied to AI growth and 24/7 clean power, this redundancy in supply isn’t a nice-to-have. It’s essential risk management.

4. How Eos’ DOE Relationship Fits the Bigger Green Tech Picture

One underappreciated part of the story is the US Department of Energy (DOE) and its role in scaling green technology from pilot to mainstream.

Eos has a loan agreement with the DOE and recently issued warrants to the Department as part of modifications to that arrangement. In return:

• Eos gets flexibility to raise private capital without tripping over loan conditions.
• The DOE gets equity upside if the company succeeds.

This “public risk, public reward” model is exactly how you accelerate infrastructure that markets underfund on their own, like:

• Long-duration storage
• Grid modernization
• Advanced manufacturing

Even as the Office of Energy Dominance Financing portfolio is under review by the Trump Administration, deals like this send an important message:

The US government is still willing to co-invest in hard green technology, not just software or offsets.

For businesses evaluating LDES partners, DOE involvement doesn’t guarantee success—but it does add a layer of technical vetting and policy alignment that pure startups rarely have.

5. What This Means for Developers, Utilities, and Climate-Focused Businesses

If you’re planning energy projects or decarbonisation strategies for 2026 and beyond, Eos’ financing and focus on US manufacturing aren’t abstract news. They create concrete options.

Where Zinc-Based LDES Makes the Most Sense

Based on how Eos is positioning its technology, zinc batteries look compelling for:

• Solar-plus-storage projects needing 6–12 hour dispatchable blocks
• Wind projects where curtailment is high and longer arbitrage windows pay off
• Microgrids in remote or wildfire-prone regions where safety is paramount
• Industrial loads that need firm, clean power overnight or through shifts

If you’re currently modeling only 2–4 hour lithium-ion systems, it’s worth adding scenarios that include 8–12 hour LDES. The capex might be higher, but:

• You can capture more value from price spreads and capacity markets
• You reduce reliance on fossil peakers
• You align better with 24/7 clean energy commitments

How to Approach Technology Choice Pragmatically

I’d recommend a simple decision framework:

1. Define your true duration need, not just what’s easy to finance today.
2. Model 20-year costs, including augmentation, replacement, O&M, and fire system costs.
3. Score safety and permitting risk explicitly—these often delay lithium-ion projects.
4. Factor in policy incentives tied to domestic content and LDES.
5. Assess counterparty strength: cash runway, backlog, pipeline, and manufacturing maturity.

Eos’ latest numbers—US$644.4 million backlog and US$22.6 billion pipeline—don’t guarantee they’ll win every project. But they do suggest real market traction, not just hype.

6. Where This Fits in the Broader Green Technology Story

Within the green technology landscape, Eos sits at the intersection of three critical shifts:

• Hardware is finally catching up to climate goals. For years, software, AI, and analytics outpaced physical infrastructure. Now, long-duration batteries, advanced inverters, and smarter grids are arriving to match the ambition.
• AI and data centers are driving new baseload demand. Tech companies want 24/7 clean energy, not annual averages. That’s impossible without firm, dispatchable green capacity—and that means storage well beyond four hours.
• Manufacturing is coming home. US-based factories for batteries and other clean technologies aren’t just about jobs. They’re about stability, security, and traceable sustainability.

LDES—whether zinc, flow, or advanced lithium—is becoming the backbone of that system. Eos’ billion-dollar bet is one piece of proof that capital markets are starting to understand this.

If your organisation is serious about decarbonisation, here’s the practical next step: treat long-duration storage as a core asset class, not an afterthought. Put it in your models. Pressure-test your assumptions. Compare chemistries. And ask hard questions about manufacturing, safety, and financing.

The companies that do this now will own the most resilient, profitable, and genuinely green portfolios in the 2030s.

---

Want to go deeper into green technology strategy? In this series, we’re unpacking how storage, AI, smart grids, and advanced manufacturing fit together into real-world decarbonisation plans—not just press releases.