Turning CO₂ Into Fuels: The Promise of Acidic Electrolysis

Most companies chasing net-zero targets are stuck on the same bottleneck: CO₂ is cheap to capture but hard to monetize. You can pay to store it underground, or you can turn it into something the market actually wants—fuels and chemicals. The catch is doing that efficiently, at scale, and in real industrial conditions.

A recent wave of research, capped by new work on iodide‑tuned CO₂ electroreduction in strong acid, points to a serious upgrade: converting CO₂ into multi‑carbon products (like ethylene and ethanol) in compact, proton‑exchange‑membrane (PEM)–style reactors. That’s the same basic architecture that already underpins gigawatts of hydrogen electrolysers.

This matters because it connects directly to where green technology is going in 2025: AI‑optimized grids feeding power into modular electrochemical units that make fuels, polymers, and solvents on demand. CO₂ electroreduction in strong acid doesn’t just clean up emissions; it can plug into existing PEM stacks, supply chains, and balance‑of‑plant systems.

In this post, I’ll break down what this new iodide‑enabled chemistry actually does, why “strong acid” is such a big deal, and how it could reshape green technology strategies for utilities, chemicals producers, and climate‑tech startups.

---

What CO₂ Electroreduction Is Really Trying To Solve

The core goal of CO₂ electroreduction is straightforward: use renewable electricity to turn CO₂ into energy‑dense molecules. Those molecules can be:

• C1 products like CO, formate, or methane
• C2+ (multi‑carbon) products like ethylene, ethanol, propanol, and acetate

From a green technology and business perspective, multi‑carbon products are where the economics get interesting:

• Ethylene is the backbone for plastics and is a >200 million tonne per year market.
• Ethanol and propanol are high‑value fuels and chemical intermediates.

If you can make C2+ products directly from CO₂ with cheap renewable power, you’re not just avoiding emissions—you’re replacing steam crackers and fossil syngas units.

The reality? Traditional CO₂ electrolysis has three big problems:

1. Alkaline systems don’t match industrial hardware. Most high‑selectivity CO₂ electrolysers run in alkaline or neutral media, which don’t integrate cleanly with mature PEM technology used for hydrogen.
2. Carbonate loss kills efficiency. In alkaline environments, CO₂ reacts with hydroxide to form carbonate and bicarbonate. You lose CO₂, waste energy, and complicate separation.
3. Hydrogen wins the competition. In acidic media, protons are abundant, so the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) outcompetes CO₂ reduction. You end up making H₂, not ethylene.

So the field has been stuck: alkaline systems work but are awkward industrially; acid systems match PEM infrastructure but usually don’t make useful carbon products.

---

Why Strong Acid Is So Attractive – And So Hard

If you’re thinking in terms of scalable green technology, strong acid (think sulfuric acid or similar pH ~0 environments) has clear advantages:

• Compatibility with PEM membranes and stacks. That’s the tech already being deployed for green hydrogen at multi‑MW scale.
• High conductivity and compact designs. You can push higher current densities and shrink reactor footprints.
• Simpler water management. Acidic PEM systems are well‑understood and backed by decades of fuel‑cell engineering.

But strong acid also brings a brutal challenge:

In strong acid, hydrogen evolution is the default reaction; CO₂ reduction is the underdog.

On a copper catalyst—still the workhorse for multi‑carbon products—protons crowd the surface, and electrons preferentially reduce them to H₂ instead of reducing CO₂ or CO. That’s why CO₂‑to‑C2+ in strong acid was long considered unrealistic.

Over the last few years, though, several breakthroughs have changed that story:

• Electric‑field engineering with alkali cations to reshape the interfacial environment
• Microenvironment control (hydrophobic layers, ionomers, local pH pockets)
• Tandem catalyst designs that first make CO, then upgrade CO to C2+ products

The new insight from iodide‑modified copper in strong acid adds another piece: the anion at the surface isn’t just a passive spectator; it can be a powerful director of both selectivity and stability.

---

How Surface‑Adsorbed Iodide Boosts Multi‑Carbon Products

The key takeaway from the latest research is simple but powerful:

A thin layer of adsorbed iodide ions on copper can tilt a strongly acidic environment away from hydrogen and toward multi‑carbon CO₂ reduction.

Here’s what’s going on beneath that statement.

1. Iodide reshapes the catalyst surface

Halides like chloride, bromide, and iodide are known to interact strongly with copper. Iodide, in particular, can:

• Adsorb onto the copper surface
• Form transient Cu–I phases
• Influence which crystal facets are exposed and how they reconstruct under potential

Those structural changes matter because C–C coupling, the step that turns two CO units into a C2 product, is highly sensitive to surface geometry. The right arrangement of Cu atoms lowers the barrier for making C2 intermediates.

2. Iodide engineers the interfacial electric field

The narrow region where electrode, electrolyte, and gas meet—the electrochemical double layer—controls which molecules get stabilized or repelled.

Surface‑adsorbed iodide:

• Alters the local electric field orientation and magnitude
• Changes how cations (like K⁺, Cs⁺, etc.) pack near the surface
• Affects the degree of hydration of these cations

Those shifts change how CO₂, CO, and key intermediates (like *CO and *OCCO) bind and react. Studies over the past decade show that stronger electric fields and hydrophobic microenvironments promote CO accumulation and C–C coupling. Iodide helps construct exactly that kind of microenvironment—even in strong acid.

3. Iodide suppresses hydrogen evolution (enough)

You won’t completely shut down hydrogen evolution in strong acid. But you don’t need to. You just need to:

• Block some of the most active hydrogen sites
• Keep enough CO‑derived intermediates on the surface long enough to couple

Iodide does both. It competes for sites that would otherwise produce H₂, while simultaneously favoring CO adsorption and dimerization pathways on copper. The net effect: a higher Faradaic efficiency toward C2+ products at industrially relevant current densities.

From a system design perspective, that translates directly to:

• More carbon converted into valuable products instead of waste H₂
• Smaller and potentially cheaper downstream separation units

---

What This Means For Green Technology And Industry

If you’re planning a green technology roadmap—for a utility, a chemicals company, or a climate‑tech startup—this chemistry unlocks several strategic advantages.

1. CO₂‑to‑chemicals in PEM‑compatible stacks

The most immediate implication: CO₂ electroreduction in strong acid can now start to look like PEM hydrogen electrolysis in terms of:

• Stack architecture (membrane‑electrode assemblies, gas‑diffusion electrodes)
• Balance of plant (water circulation, compression, power electronics)
• Operational parameters (current densities approaching or exceeding 1 A cm⁻²)

That alignment is huge. It means you can:

• Reuse engineering know‑how and supply chains from PEM H₂
• Co‑locate CO₂ and H₂ production in modular plants
• Scale faster because major components are already industrialized

2. Higher single‑pass CO₂ utilization

Strong‑acid, membrane‑electrode‑assembly designs have already hit single‑pass CO₂ conversion efficiencies approaching 90% in some demonstrations. Add in an iodide‑engineered catalyst that directs more of that carbon into C2+ products, and you get:

• Less recycle of unreacted CO₂
• Lower compression and separation energy
• Better overall energy and carbon efficiency for the plant

For grid‑connected systems using variable renewables, that efficiency makes flexible, on‑off operation less punishing.

3. Cleaner, AI‑optimizible process signals

One under‑discussed benefit: strong‑acid CO₂ electrolysis creates cleaner datasets for AI process control.

• Fewer competing side reactions from carbonate chemistry
• More stable ionic composition of the electrolyte
• Clearer correlations between potential, current, and product distribution

That’s fertile ground for AI models that adjust current density, temperature, and feed composition in real time to maximize C2+ yield and minimize degradation. For operators already using AI to manage electrolyser fleets, acidic CO₂ reduction slots into existing analytics and control pipelines more naturally than wonky alkaline chemistries.

---

Practical Considerations For Companies And Developers

If you’re thinking, “What would it take to actually implement this?”, here’s a pragmatic checklist.

1. Technology readiness and pilots

We’re not at full commercial deployment yet. But the trajectory is clear:

• Lab‑scale: Detailed mechanistic studies (like the iodide work) clarifying active sites, intermediates, and degradation.
• Bench‑scale: Flow cells and small MEAs hitting high current density with meaningful C2+ selectivities.
• Pilot‑scale: 10–100 kW systems integrated with CO₂ capture units and renewable power.

If your organization runs an R&D or innovation program, the realistic near‑term move is joint development or pilot participation, not buying a turnkey plant tomorrow.

2. Integration with existing green tech assets

Companies already deploying green technology—especially electrolytic hydrogen—have a head start. Acidic CO₂ electroreduction can:

• Share power infrastructure and DC bus with H₂ electrolysers
• Use similar stack housing and assembly designs
• Plug into existing AI‑based asset management systems for predictive maintenance and optimization

In my experience, firms that treat CO₂ electrolysis as an extension of their PEM stack portfolio, rather than a totally separate technology, move faster and spend less.

3. Product strategy: what do you actually want to make?

The iodide‑enhanced approach helps with a mix of C2+ products—often ethylene, ethanol, acetate, and others. From a business lens, you should be explicit about:

• Target product slate: fuels, monomers, or oxygenates?
• Market access: do you have offtake agreements or internal use cases?
• Separation and purification: gaseous vs liquid products, required purity, regulatory constraints.

Electrochemistry is only half the story. Downstream processing and market positioning can make or break the economics.

---

Where AI Fits In The Future Of Acidic CO₂ Electrolysis

Since this post sits in a green technology series with a strong AI angle, it’s worth calling out how AI actually helps here—not as a buzzword, but as a concrete toolset.

Here are three high‑impact roles I see:

1. Catalyst discovery and optimization
   Models informed by density‑functional‑theory data and experimental results can screen halide combinations, cation choices, and surface structures far faster than trial‑and‑error.

2. Digital twins for electrolysers
   High‑fidelity process models, trained on real plant data, can predict how iodide‑modified catalysts age, when performance drifts, and how to adjust operation to compensate.

3. Grid‑aware dispatch
   CO₂‑to‑fuel plants won’t run flat out 24/7 on renewables. AI scheduling can align high‑intensity operation with low‑cost, low‑carbon hours while still hitting production targets.

The bottom line: acidic CO₂ electrolysis is exactly the kind of high‑dimensional, tightly coupled system where AI control pays off—and the new iodide‑driven chemistry makes that system far more attractive to build in the first place.

---

Where This Leaves You In 2025

Here’s the thing about CO₂ electroreduction in strong acid: five years ago, it was mostly a curiosity. Today, with detailed insights into how surface‑adsorbed iodide ions and tailored microenvironments steer copper toward multi‑carbon products, it’s becoming a serious candidate for large‑scale deployment.

For organizations building green technology strategies, the smart move now is to:

• Track and engage with pilot projects using acidic, PEM‑style CO₂ electrolysers.
• Start evaluating co‑location scenarios with existing capture and renewable assets.
• Build internal capability—often AI‑driven—for monitoring, optimization, and product‑slate control in electrochemical processes.

CO₂ isn’t just a liability any more; with the right electrochemistry, it’s feedstock. The companies that learn to run these iodide‑tuned, strongly acidic systems efficiently will own a critical part of the next generation of green industrial infrastructure.